PENEGAKAN HUKUM OLEH KOMISI PERLINDUNGAN PERSAINGAN USAHA DALAM PENANGANAN PERSAINGAN USAHA TIDAK SEHAT DITENGAH WABAH COVID-19

Gebrina Ayu Nastiti Gebrina Ayu Nastiti

Abstract


The objective of the research is to explore the functions and roles of KPPU (Business Competition Supervisory Commission) in eradicating various monopolistic practices and unfair business competition which occurred in covid-19 case. Since this case has become a global pandemic, some people or business people whom aware about this pandemic deliberately hoard masks, hand sanitizers and resell them in unimaginable high prices, whereas, these two items are urgently needed only for those whose infected Covid-19. There is also information that some hospitals offer a package of rapid test for the public in expensive prices, which limits the ability of the community to testify themselves whether to isolate  independently at home or do the hospital treatment. Law Number 5 Year 1999 concerning monopolistic practices and unfair business competition is used in discussing this research. In this research, it is known that KPPU has not been able to carry out an investigation unless, information and evidence from the parties who feel disadvantaged by the existence of monopoly and unfair business competition were provided. In addition, if however fraud has been detected, the sentence which will be faced by monopolists or unfair business actors is mere an administrative sentence

Keywords


KPPU's role (Business Competition Supervisory Commission), Covid-19, Unfair Business Competition

References


Arief, Barda Nawawi. Kapita Selekta Hukum Pidana, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung, 2003.

Citrawan, Fitrah Akbar, “Kebijakan Formulasi Tindak Pidana Terhadap Pelaku Usaha yang Tidak Melaksanakan Putusan KPPU yang Sudah Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap (BHT)”, Jurnal Hukum Kaidah, Vol. 19 No.2 2019.

D.,Prayoga Ayudha D, Persaingan Usaha dan Hukum yang Mengaturnya di Indonesia, Proyek Elips, Jakarta, 2000

Hariej, Eddy O.S. Prinsip-Prinsip Hukum Pidana, Cahaya Atma Pustaka, Yogyakarta, 2016.

Muladi, “Proyeksi Hukum Pidana Materiil Indonesia di Masa Datang”, Naskah Pidato Pengukuhan, Diucapkan pada Peresmian Penerimaan Jabatan Guru Besar Dalam Ilmu Hukum pada Fakultas Hukum Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, 1990

Mustafa, Rokan Kamal. Hukum Persaingan Usaha (Teori dan Prakteknya di Indonesia), Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta, 2010.

Risalah Rapat Proses Pembahasan Rancangan Undang-Undang tentang Larangan Praktik Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat, Sekretariat Jenderal DPR RI, Jakarta, 1999.

Saragih, Guntur Syahputra. “Update Eksekusi Putusan KPPU”, artikel, diunduh dari http://www.kppu.go.id/id/blog/2019 /07/updateeksekusi-putusan-kppu/

Sudarto, Kapita Selekta Hukum Pidana, Alumni, Bandung, 1986.

Sulaeman, Eman. “Kebijakan Penggunaan Sanksi Pidana dalam Perundang-Undangan Hukum Administrasi”, Wahana Akademika, IAIN Walisongo Semarang, Vol. 1 No.1 2014.. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21580/wa.v1i1.806.

Utomo, Hatta Isnaini Wahyu. "The Existence of the Notary and Notarial Deeds within Private Procedural Law in the Industrial Revolution era 4.0", International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, Volume 10, Issue 3, 2019.

Utomo, Hatta Isnaini Wahyu. “The Position of Honorary Council of Notary in Coaching Indonesian Notaries”, Journal of Law, Policy and Globalization, Vol. 92 (2019), DOI: 10.7176/JLPG/92-12

Utomo, Hatta Isnaini Wahyu.; Safi’i, Imam. “Tanggung Jawab Mantan Karyawan Notaris Sebagai Saksi Akta Terhadap Kerahasian Akta”, Jurnal Res Judicata, (Vol. 2 No. 1). DOI : 10.29406/rj.v2i1.1444




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.29406/rj.v3i1.2060

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Res Judicata